Skip to main content

Week 4 - Prensky's & Kirschner's Research on the Digital World

We live in a society that continuously evolves and one of those things that has evolved is our technology, including our amount of usage of technology. We can see it everywhere nowadays, especially at our fingertips or hands. Most of us live in the digital world. There also have been a number of research done on the digital world and a number of opinions. Paul A. Kirschner and Marc Prensky are examples of people who have provided their input. 

According to Prensky, what is the immigrant/native divide, and how has it affected how students learn? 

There are two divides that Prensky mentioned and one of them is called the digital immigrants or the immigrant divide. The digital immigrants are usually the people who have been born into a world without the digital aspect. At some point, digital immigrants have adapted to some areas of the digital world such as using computers, but will retain some habits of their pre-digital world. One example of these pre-digital habits would be printing out a document to read instead of reading it on the screen. 
The other divide that Prensky has mentioned is the digital natives or the native divide. They are people who have grown up with the technology we have today such as smartphones and grew up with the slang, memes, and more. They majorly use the digital world more often compared to the digital immigrants. 
According to Prensky, both of these divides have affected how students learn. According to him digital immigrant teachers/instructors struggle to teach digital natives due to the differences of "digital languages." Digital immigrants' language is more outdated compared to digital natives. Students may also resist the teaching styles of their instructors due to "They are used to the instantaneity of hypertext, downloaded music, phones in their pockets, a library on their laptops, beamed messages and instant messaging." (Prensky, 2012) There are a few other reasons Prensky has stated but these are a couple of the reasons why there may be a divide. 

Kirschner some of the myths associated with Prensky's findings. One of the myths he discusses is that being a 'digital native' doesn't necessarily mean one is 'digitally literate.'’ What does he mean? 

From my findings, Kirschner may be stating that when one is a digital native it does not mean they might be well versed in the digital world. In the article he wrote, "Finally, McNaught, Lam, and Ho (2009) found that “so-called digital natives (students) were not always more digitally-oriented than the so-called immigrants (teachers)” (p. 10)." (Kirschner, 2017) He also argued that digital literacy must be taught like any other skill we learn, "The skills and competences attributed to this generation of students are the same as any other skills and competences, namely that they need to be properly taught and acquired before they can be applied." (Kirschner, 2017) Therefore that without being taught the skills of the digital world despite being born in the digital world, they may not be as digitally literate. They may not posses the skills to critically evaluate information found online, format documents online, or perhaps not understand online safety. 

Connect with me on LinkedIn

References: 
Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom : hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Corwin.
Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 10 - Social Semiotics

As someone who is Deaf with cochlear implants, I rarely rely on auditory information, but rather visual information. I tend to take in more visual information more than others. I can remember my way back to the apartments I used to live in or the old house I used to live in from a little over a decade ago. This was because of visual information. Visual information is an extremely important part in helping me gain knowledge and is usually what I prefer to take in.  Social Semiotics is one example of analyzing visual information. Social semiotics was developed by a linguist, Michael Halliday, and contributed further by Gunther Kress. Social Semiotics goes into depth of analyzing social communication methods such as images, texts, and gestures. We will be focusing on images today. It helps us understand what the images are telling us. It takes into account the composition, the colors used, and more.  Vertical positioning in social semiotics play a huge role in creating a meaning...

Week 8 - Communication Fallacies

It can be difficult to determine a communication fallacy and easy to fall for it when you are not paying attention. It can also be possible when you may not know what kind of fallacies are there and what you should look for. This can be seen in many articles and social media posts.  For example, @RealAlexJones on Twitter wrote a post stating that "If the statistical trend continues with this tragic event, there is a 98% chance the shooting is trans or gang related . If it is another trans wack job or a gang shooting , it will be out of the news in less than 24 hours.." There was not a single source listed about the statistics of trans or gang-related shooting. He also used the term "trans wack job" which seems like the post is transphobic. The video has not stated anything about the school shooter's identity (or mention of LGBTQ+ identity) due to the fact that they had no information. This would be an example of an appeal to ignorance fallacy.

WEEK 5 - Clooless Podcast

I personally have never been into podcasts. There are a number of reasons as to why I never liked them and one of the main reasons is that I am Deaf. I require more visual information than others (lips for me to read and captions). I also have ADHD and podcasts have never been able to hold my attention for more than a minute, however there is this one podcast called Clooless Podcast  that managed to do this. I am going to warn you though that this is not a family friendly podcast and is more of a "we're doing fun shenanigans" podcast. It is a podcast with four men (who are both YouTubers and Twitch streamers) called Puffer, Grizzy, Pezzy, and Droid.  Clooless Podcast's Logo Reflect on your overall listening experience. What did you learn about the importance of delivery in audio podcasts, and how will this influence your approach to creating your own podcast?  I think what I took away from this listening experience is the fact that they are comfortable in sharing expe...